What are the chances of seeing a Broad Scarlet in Cévennes National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Broad Scarlet sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 329th most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad Scarlet in Cévennes National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Broad Scarlet in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to May, the lowest months. That is one of Cévennes National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain against 260 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Broad Scarlet?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad Scarlet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Broad Scarlet?
21st of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Broad Scarlet sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 21st at about 10%. The best odds are in Camargue (France, about 40%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 40%) and Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Broad Scarlet live in Cévennes National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Broad Scarlet that you can see in Cévennes National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Keeled Skimmer (about 20%), Broad-Bodied Chaser (about 20%) and Common Darter (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad Scarlet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad Scarlet is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.