What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-sided Crake in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-sided Crake sighting in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 226th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-sided Crake in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
April–May and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-sided Crake in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-sided Crake?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-sided Crake sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chapada Diamantina National Park the best place to see a Rufous-sided Crake?
7th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Rufous-sided Crake sightings, Chapada Diamantina National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-sided Crake live in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Same family: Rallidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-sided Crake that you can see in Chapada Diamantina National Park (family Rallidae, Rails, Gallinules, and Coots) are Russet-Crowned Crake (about 10%) and Common Moorhen (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-sided Crake sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-sided Crake is recorded against all the birds logged in Chapada Diamantina National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.