What are the chances of seeing a Lemon Pansy in Chitwan National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lemon Pansy sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 24 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lemon Pansy in Chitwan National Park?
October
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Lemon Pansy in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–July and September, the lowest months. That is one of Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 75 mm of rain against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Lemon Pansy?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lemon Pansy sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Lemon Pansy?
16th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Lemon Pansy sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 16th at about 20%. The best odds are in Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 30%), Mudumalai National Park (India, about 30%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Lemon Pansy live in Chitwan National Park?
Same genus: Junonia
The closest relatives of the Lemon Pansy that you can see in Chitwan National Park (genus Junonia, Buckeyes & Pansies) are Grey Pansy (about 30%), Peacock Pansy (about 30%) and Chocolate Pansy (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lemon Pansy sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lemon Pansy is recorded against all the insects logged in Chitwan National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.