What are the chances of seeing a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Chattogram?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting in Chattogram on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 66th most-seen of the 76 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Chattogram?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Chattogram on a given day, against under 5% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Chattogram's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 780 mm in July. April and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Chattogram the best place to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
31st of 45
Of the 45 cities where we can rate Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings, Chattogram ranks 31st at about 10%. The best odds are in Bengaluru (India, about 70%), Thiruvananthapuram (India, about 60%) and Kollam (India, about 60%).
Which relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker live in Chattogram?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker that you can see in Chattogram (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Indian Pied Starling (about 80%), House Crow (about 70%) and Striated Grassbird (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale-billed Flowerpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Chattogram (5 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.