What are the chances of seeing a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Prayagraj?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting in Prayagraj on a given day, based on 106 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 42nd most-seen of the 139 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Prayagraj?
February and March
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Prayagraj on a given day, against about 10% in June–August and October–January, the lowest months. Those are among Prayagraj's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain a month against 260 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Prayagraj the best place to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
16th of 45
Of the 45 cities where we can rate Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings, Prayagraj ranks 16th at about 20%. The best odds are in Bengaluru (India, about 70%), Thiruvananthapuram (India, about 60%) and Kollam (India, about 60%).
Which relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker live in Prayagraj?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker that you can see in Prayagraj (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are House Crow (about 80%), Jungle Babbler (about 80%) and Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale-billed Flowerpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Prayagraj (106 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.