What are the chances of seeing a Marbled Wood Quail in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Wood Quail sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 291st most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Marbled Wood Quail in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Wood Quail in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Marbled Wood Quail?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Marbled Wood Quail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Marbled Wood Quail?
9th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Marbled Wood Quail sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%), Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%) and Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Marbled Wood Quail live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same order: Galliformes
The closest relatives of the Marbled Wood Quail that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (order Galliformes, Landfowl) are Speckled Chachalaca (about 20%), Spix's Guan (about 20%) and Blue-throated Piping-Guan (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Marbled Wood Quail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Marbled Wood Quail is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.