What are the chances of seeing a Large Woodshrike in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Large Woodshrike sighting in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, based on 156 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 258 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Large Woodshrike in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
June and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Large Woodshrike in Danum Valley Conservation Area on a given day, against under 5% in February and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Large Woodshrike?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Large Woodshrike sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Danum Valley Conservation Area the best place to see a Large Woodshrike?
6th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Large Woodshrike sightings, Danum Valley Conservation Area ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, about 30%), Manas National Park (India, about 20%) and Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Large Woodshrike live in Danum Valley Conservation Area?
Same family: Tephrodornithidae
The closest relatives of the Large Woodshrike that you can see in Danum Valley Conservation Area (family Tephrodornithidae) are Rufous-winged Philentoma (about 20%), Maroon-breasted Philentoma (about 20%) and Black-winged Flycatcher-shrike (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Large Woodshrike sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Large Woodshrike is recorded against all the birds logged in Danum Valley Conservation Area (156 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.