What are the chances of seeing a Campo Flicker in Emas National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Campo Flicker sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 153 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Campo Flicker in Emas National Park?
June and September
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Campo Flicker in Emas National Park on a given day, against about 30% in October, the lowest month. Those are among Emas National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 190 mm in January. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Campo Flicker?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Campo Flicker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Campo Flicker?
Yes
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Campo Flicker sightings, Emas National Park has the highest daily chance: about 60%. Next come Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 60%) and Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Campo Flicker live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Campo Flicker that you can see in Emas National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are White Woodpecker (about 30%), Lineated Woodpecker (about 20%) and White-wedged Piculet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Campo Flicker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Campo Flicker is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (153 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.