What are the chances of seeing an Audubon's Warbler in Great Bear Rainforest?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Audubon's Warbler sighting in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 85th most-seen of the 239 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Audubon's Warbler in Great Bear Rainforest?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Audubon's Warbler in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, against under 5% in May–August and October–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Audubon's Warbler?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Audubon's Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Bear Rainforest the best place to see an Audubon's Warbler?
13th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Audubon's Warbler sightings, Great Bear Rainforest ranks 13th at about 10%. The best odds are in Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca (Mexico, about 30%), Big Bend National Park (United States, about 20%) and Guadalupe Mountains National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Audubon's Warbler live in Great Bear Rainforest?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Audubon's Warbler that you can see in Great Bear Rainforest (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Townsend's Warbler (about 20%), Yellow-rumped Warbler (about 20%) and Yellow Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Audubon's Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Audubon's Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Great Bear Rainforest (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.