Lasiocampa trifolii
In 3 days ~70% in a week ~90%
Lasiocampa trifolii, the grass eggar, is a moth of the family Lasiocampidae first described by Michael Denis and Ignaz Schiffermüller in 1775 and found in Europe. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiskunság National Park | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 2 | Picos de Europa National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 3 | Doñana National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 4 | Monfragüe National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 5 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 6 | Camargue | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 7 | Triglav National Park | 🇸🇮 Slovenia | |
| 8 | Sierra Nevada National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 9 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 10 | Wadden Sea National Park | 🇩🇪 Germany | |
| 11 | Fertő-Hanság National Park | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 12 | Sierra de Guadarrama National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain |
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Grass Eggar sighting in Kiskunság National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 21st most-seen of the 95 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
April–May and September
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Grass Eggar in Kiskunság National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, July and October, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grass Eggar sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Grass Eggar sightings, Kiskunság National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 20%) and Doñana National Park (Spain, about 20%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grass Eggar is recorded against all the insects logged in Kiskunság National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
