What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Lake Nakuru National Park on a given day, based on 328 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 369 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park?
July–September and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Nakuru National Park the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
7th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Lake Nakuru National Park ranks 7th at about 30%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Lake Nakuru National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Lake Nakuru National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Speke's Weaver (about 30%), Village Weaver (about 20%) and Spectacled Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Nakuru National Park (328 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.