What are the chances of seeing a Red-headed Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-headed Weaver sighting in Lake Nakuru National Park on a given day, based on 101 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 369 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-headed Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park?
March and June
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-headed Weaver in Lake Nakuru National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-headed Weaver?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-headed Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Nakuru National Park the best place to see a Red-headed Weaver?
16th of 34
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Red-headed Weaver sightings, Lake Nakuru National Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 30%), Ruaha National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Meru National Park (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Red-headed Weaver live in Lake Nakuru National Park?
Same family: Ploceidae
The closest relatives of the Red-headed Weaver that you can see in Lake Nakuru National Park (family Ploceidae, Weavers and Allies) are Speke's Weaver (about 30%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 30%) and Village Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-headed Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-headed Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Nakuru National Park (101 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.