What are the chances of seeing a Junonia lavinia in Machalilla National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Junonia lavinia sighting in Machalilla National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 11 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Junonia lavinia in Machalilla National Park?
March
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Junonia lavinia in Machalilla National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to February, the lowest months. That is one of Machalilla National Park's wettest months, with about 130 mm of rain against 5 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Junonia lavinia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Junonia lavinia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Machalilla National Park the best place to see a Junonia lavinia?
5th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Junonia lavinia sightings, Machalilla National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 30%), El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Junonia lavinia live in Machalilla National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Junonia lavinia that you can see in Machalilla National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Gray Cracker (about 30%), Red Peacock (about 30%) and Anthanassa hermas (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Junonia lavinia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Junonia lavinia is recorded against all the insects logged in Machalilla National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.