What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Falcon in Mana Pools National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon sighting in Mana Pools National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 263rd most-seen of the 275 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Falcon in Mana Pools National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon in Mana Pools National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. March has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Mana Pools National Park the best place to see a Red-necked Falcon?
15th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Red-necked Falcon sightings, Mana Pools National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%), Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-necked Falcon live in Mana Pools National Park?
Same genus: Falco
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Falcon that you can see in Mana Pools National Park (genus Falco, Typical Falcons) are Eurasian Hobby (about 10%), Dickinson's Kestrel (about 10%) and Lanner Falcon (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Mana Pools National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.