What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Stork in Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 226th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Stork in Manas National Park?
February and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork in Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and March–November, the lowest months. Those are among Manas National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 1070 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Stork?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Stork sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Stork?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-necked Stork sightings, Manas National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 40%) and Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-necked Stork live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Ciconiidae
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Stork that you can see in Manas National Park (family Ciconiidae, Storks) are Lesser Adjutant (about 40%), Asian Openbill Stork (about 30%) and Black Stork (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Stork sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Stork is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.