What are the chances of seeing a Polymnia Tigerwing in Manuel Antonio National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Polymnia Tigerwing sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 69 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Polymnia Tigerwing in Manuel Antonio National Park?
January–February, April, July and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Polymnia Tigerwing in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–June, August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Polymnia Tigerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Polymnia Tigerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Polymnia Tigerwing?
8th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Polymnia Tigerwing sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%), Carara National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Polymnia Tigerwing live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Polymnia Tigerwing that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Hewitson's Longwing (about 20%) and Amathonte Morpho (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Polymnia Tigerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Polymnia Tigerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.