What are the chances of seeing a Pied Bushchat in Nagarhole National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat sighting in Nagarhole National Park on a given day, based on 248 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 96th most-seen of the 272 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Bushchat in Nagarhole National Park?
January, May, August–September and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat in Nagarhole National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–April, June–July, October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Bushchat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Bushchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nagarhole National Park the best place to see a Pied Bushchat?
12th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Pied Bushchat sightings, Nagarhole National Park ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 90%), Eravikulam National Park (India, about 70%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Bushchat live in Nagarhole National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Bushchat that you can see in Nagarhole National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 50%), Tickell's Blue Flycatcher (about 30%) and Asian Brown Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Bushchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Bushchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Nagarhole National Park (248 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.