What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Falcon in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon sighting in Namib-Naukluft National Park on a given day, based on 48 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 108 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Falcon in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon in Namib-Naukluft National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, July and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namib-Naukluft National Park the best place to see a Red-necked Falcon?
5th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Red-necked Falcon sightings, Namib-Naukluft National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%), Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-necked Falcon live in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
Same genus: Falco
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Falcon that you can see in Namib-Naukluft National Park (genus Falco, Typical Falcons) are Greater Kestrel (about 20%) and Rock Kestrel (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Namib-Naukluft National Park (48 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.