What are the chances of seeing a Red-billed Teal in Pilanesberg National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-billed Teal sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 86 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-billed Teal in Pilanesberg National Park?
October and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red-billed Teal in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–March, May, July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-billed Teal?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-billed Teal sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Red-billed Teal?
5th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Red-billed Teal sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Amboseli National Park (Kenya, about 50%), Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe, about 40%) and Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-billed Teal live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same genus: Anas
The closest relatives of the Red-billed Teal that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (genus Anas, Mallards, Pintails, and Allies) are Yellow-billed Duck (about 20%) and African Black Duck (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-billed Teal sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-billed Teal is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (86 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.