What are the chances of seeing a Wahlberg's Eagle in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wahlberg's Eagle sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 216 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 130th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wahlberg's Eagle in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
February and March
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Wahlberg's Eagle in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April–May and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Wahlberg's Eagle?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wahlberg's Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Wahlberg's Eagle?
10th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Wahlberg's Eagle sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kruger National Park (South Africa, about 30%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 30%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Wahlberg's Eagle live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Wahlberg's Eagle that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are African Fish-Eagle (about 60%), Palmnut Vulture (about 50%) and Long-crested Eagle (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wahlberg's Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wahlberg's Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (216 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.