What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Falcon in Ruaha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 199th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Falcon in Ruaha National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Falcon in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August–September and November–February, the lowest months. That is one of Ruaha National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 180 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Red-necked Falcon?
7th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Red-necked Falcon sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%), Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-necked Falcon live in Ruaha National Park?
Same genus: Falco
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Falcon that you can see in Ruaha National Park (genus Falco, Typical Falcons) are Grey Kestrel (about 40%) and Eurasian Hobby (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.