What are the chances of seeing a Brazilian Teal in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Brazilian Teal sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brazilian Teal in Serra da Canastra National Park?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brazilian Teal in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months. That is one of Serra da Canastra National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 280 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Brazilian Teal?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brazilian Teal sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Brazilian Teal?
6th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Brazilian Teal sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 50%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 30%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Brazilian Teal live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Brazilian Teal that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Brazilian Merganser (about 20%) and Muscovy Duck (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brazilian Teal sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brazilian Teal is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.