What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-browed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-browed Tyrant sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 53 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 153rd most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-browed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park?
August and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-browed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May and July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-browed Tyrant?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-browed Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Yellow-browed Tyrant?
2nd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Yellow-browed Tyrant sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-browed Tyrant live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-browed Tyrant that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), White-rumped Monjita (about 50%) and Crested Black-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-browed Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-browed Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (53 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.