What are the chances of seeing a Junonia lavinia in Soberanía National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Junonia lavinia sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 37 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 30th most-seen of the 253 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Junonia lavinia in Soberanía National Park?
February and April–June
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Junonia lavinia in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Junonia lavinia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Junonia lavinia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Junonia lavinia?
7th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Junonia lavinia sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 30%), El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Junonia lavinia live in Soberanía National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Junonia lavinia that you can see in Soberanía National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 40%), White Peacock (about 30%) and Many-Banded Daggerwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Junonia lavinia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Junonia lavinia is recorded against all the insects logged in Soberanía National Park (37 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.