What are the chances of seeing an Apple Looper in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Apple Looper sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 160th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Apple Looper in Springbrook National Park?
July–August and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Apple Looper in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and December–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Apple Looper?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Apple Looper sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Apple Looper?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Apple Looper sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Booderee National Park (Australia, about 20%), Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Apple Looper live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Apple Looper that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), White Looper Moth (about 20%) and Southern Bracca (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Apple Looper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Apple Looper is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.