What are the chances of seeing an Agami Heron in Tambopata National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Agami Heron sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 131 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 285th most-seen of the 550 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Agami Heron in Tambopata National Reserve?
February, April and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agami Heron in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Agami Heron?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agami Heron sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see an Agami Heron?
6th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Agami Heron sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 20%), Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Agami Heron live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same family: Ardeidae
The closest relatives of the Agami Heron that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (family Ardeidae, Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns) are Snowy Egret (about 20%), Cocoi Heron (about 20%) and Capped Heron (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Agami Heron sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Agami Heron is recorded against all the birds logged in Tambopata National Reserve (131 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.