What are the chances of seeing a Pale Flycatcher in Akagera National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Flycatcher sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 85 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 114th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale Flycatcher in Akagera National Park?
March and April
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Flycatcher in Akagera National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, August–September and November, the lowest months. Those are among Akagera National Park's wettest months, with about 90 mm of rain a month against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pale Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Pale Flycatcher?
3rd of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Pale Flycatcher sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Pale Flycatcher live in Akagera National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Pale Flycatcher that you can see in Akagera National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Sooty Chat (about 50%), White-browed Robin-Chat (about 40%) and White-headed Black-Chat (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (85 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.