What are the chances of seeing a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Amboró National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting in Amboró National Park on a given day, based on 72 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 77th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Amboró National Park?
January, March, September and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Amboró National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February, April–May, July–August, October and December, the lowest months. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboró National Park the best place to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
2nd of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings, Amboró National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia live in Amboró National Park?
Same family: Fringillidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia that you can see in Amboró National Park (family Fringillidae, Finches, Euphonias, and Allies) are Thick-billed Euphonia (about 20%), Purple-throated Euphonia (about 20%) and Hooded Siskin (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-naped Chlorophonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboró National Park (72 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.