What are the chances of seeing a Golden-tailed Sapphire in Amboró National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-tailed Sapphire sighting in Amboró National Park on a given day, based on 51 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 89th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-tailed Sapphire in Amboró National Park?
September and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-tailed Sapphire in Amboró National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, July and November, the lowest months. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-tailed Sapphire?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-tailed Sapphire sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboró National Park the best place to see a Golden-tailed Sapphire?
4th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Golden-tailed Sapphire sightings, Amboró National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, about 20%) and Henri Pittier National Park (Venezuela, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Golden-tailed Sapphire live in Amboró National Park?
Same family: Trochilidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-tailed Sapphire that you can see in Amboró National Park (family Trochilidae, Hummingbirds) are Fork-tailed Woodnymph (about 30%), White-bellied Hummingbird (about 20%) and Planalto Hermit (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-tailed Sapphire sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-tailed Sapphire is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboró National Park (51 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.