What are the chances of seeing a Javan Cuckoo-shrike in Bali Barat National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Javan Cuckoo-shrike sighting in Bali Barat National Park on a given day, based on 245 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 173 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Javan Cuckoo-shrike in Bali Barat National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Javan Cuckoo-shrike in Bali Barat National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Bali Barat National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 280 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Javan Cuckoo-shrike?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Javan Cuckoo-shrike sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bali Barat National Park the best place to see a Javan Cuckoo-shrike?
Yes
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Javan Cuckoo-shrike sightings, Bali Barat National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 20%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Javan Cuckoo-shrike live in Bali Barat National Park?
Same family: Campephagidae
The closest relatives of the Javan Cuckoo-shrike that you can see in Bali Barat National Park (family Campephagidae, Cuckooshrikes) are White-shouldered Triller (about 60%), Small Minivet (about 40%) and Pied Triller (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Javan Cuckoo-shrike sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Javan Cuckoo-shrike is recorded against all the birds logged in Bali Barat National Park (245 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.