What are the chances of seeing a Hammond's Flycatcher in Celaque National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hammond's Flycatcher sighting in Celaque National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 193 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hammond's Flycatcher in Celaque National Park?
April, October and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hammond's Flycatcher in Celaque National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Hammond's Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hammond's Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celaque National Park the best place to see a Hammond's Flycatcher?
12th of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Hammond's Flycatcher sightings, Celaque National Park ranks 12th at about 10%. The best odds are in Glacier National Park (United States, about 20%), El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%) and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Hammond's Flycatcher live in Celaque National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Hammond's Flycatcher that you can see in Celaque National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (about 10%), Yellowish Flycatcher (about 10%) and Least Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hammond's Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hammond's Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Celaque National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.