What are the chances of seeing a Tiger Longwing in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Longwing sighting in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 26th most-seen of the 80 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tiger Longwing in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park?
December
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Longwing in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–May, July and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Tiger Longwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tiger Longwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park the best place to see a Tiger Longwing?
8th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Tiger Longwing sightings, Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%), Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Tiger Longwing live in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Tiger Longwing that you can see in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Cream-Spotted Tigerwing (about 30%), Rusted Clearwing-Satyr (about 30%) and Banded Peacock (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tiger Longwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tiger Longwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.