What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Elaenia in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Elaenia sighting in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 249th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Elaenia in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Elaenia in Chapada Diamantina National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Elaenia?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Elaenia sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chapada Diamantina National Park the best place to see a Lesser Elaenia?
9th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Lesser Elaenia sightings, Chapada Diamantina National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Emas National Park (Brazil, about 20%), Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Coiba National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Elaenia live in Chapada Diamantina National Park?
Same genus: Elaenia
The closest relatives of the Lesser Elaenia that you can see in Chapada Diamantina National Park (genus Elaenia, Typical Elaenias) are Plain-crested Elaenia (about 50%), Yellow-bellied Elaenia (about 20%) and Small-headed Elaenia (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Elaenia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Elaenia is recorded against all the birds logged in Chapada Diamantina National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.