What are the chances of seeing a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant in Campo Grande?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant sighting in Campo Grande on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 144th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant in Campo Grande?
December
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant in Campo Grande on a given day, against under 5% in January to November, the lowest months. That is one of Campo Grande's wettest months, with about 180 mm of rain against 30 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Campo Grande the best place to see a Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant?
4th of 6
Of the 6 cities where we can rate Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant sightings, Campo Grande ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Asuncion (Paraguay, about 20%), Santa Cruz de la Sierra (Bolivia, about 10%) and Cordoba (Argentina, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant live in Campo Grande?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant that you can see in Campo Grande (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 90%), Tropical Kingbird (about 50%) and Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pearly-vented Tody-Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Campo Grande (23 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.