What are the chances of seeing a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth in Kota?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth sighting in Kota on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 18th most-seen of the 33 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth in Kota?
February and July–August
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth in Kota on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–June and November, the lowest months. Those are among Kota's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain a month against almost none in December.
What time of day is best to see a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Kota the best place to see a Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth?
17th of 118
Of the 118 cities where we can rate Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth sightings, Kota ranks 17th at about 30%. The best odds are in Vijayawada (India, about 60%), Doha (Qatar, about 50%) and Jamshedpur (India, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth live in Kota?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth that you can see in Kota (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Plain Tiger Butterfly (about 40%), Lesser Grass Blue (about 40%) and Indian Lily Moth (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Kota (11 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.