What are the chances of seeing a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift in Henri Pittier National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 62 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 113th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift in Henri Pittier National Park?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fork-tailed Palm-Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Fork-tailed Palm-Swift?
7th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Fork-tailed Palm-Swift sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 40%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 40%) and Emas National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Fork-tailed Palm-Swift live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Fork-tailed Palm-Swift that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-collared Swift (about 20%), White-tipped Swift (about 20%) and Vaux's Swift (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fork-tailed Palm-Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fork-tailed Palm-Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (62 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.