What are the chances of seeing a Gray Hairstreak in Joshua Tree National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Gray Hairstreak sighting in Joshua Tree National Park on a given day, based on 53 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 37th most-seen of the 190 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gray Hairstreak in Joshua Tree National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Gray Hairstreak in Joshua Tree National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gray Hairstreak?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Joshua Tree National Park the best place to see a Gray Hairstreak?
8th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Gray Hairstreak sightings, Joshua Tree National Park ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Big Bend National Park (United States, about 30%), Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 20%) and Congaree National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Gray Hairstreak live in Joshua Tree National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Gray Hairstreak that you can see in Joshua Tree National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Great Purple Hairstreak (about 30%), Marine Blue (about 20%) and Western Pygmy-Blue (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gray Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Joshua Tree National Park (53 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.