What are the chances of seeing a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Kaziranga National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cotton Pygmy-Goose sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 189 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 142nd most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Kaziranga National Park?
February and April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and October–November, the lowest months. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cotton Pygmy-Goose sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose?
4th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Cotton Pygmy-Goose sightings, Kaziranga National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 20%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 20%) and Sundarbans National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cotton Pygmy-Goose live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Cotton Pygmy-Goose that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Indian Spot-billed Duck (about 70%), Bar-headed Goose (about 70%) and Ruddy Shelduck (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cotton Pygmy-Goose sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cotton Pygmy-Goose is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (189 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.