What are the chances of seeing a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Satpura National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cotton Pygmy-Goose sighting in Satpura National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 259 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Satpura National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cotton Pygmy-Goose in Satpura National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cotton Pygmy-Goose sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Satpura National Park the best place to see a Cotton Pygmy-Goose?
13th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Cotton Pygmy-Goose sightings, Satpura National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 20%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 20%) and Sundarbans National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cotton Pygmy-Goose live in Satpura National Park?
Same family: Anatidae
The closest relatives of the Cotton Pygmy-Goose that you can see in Satpura National Park (family Anatidae, Ducks, Geese, and Swans) are Lesser Whistling-Duck (about 20%), Indian Spot-billed Duck (about 20%) and Bar-headed Goose (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cotton Pygmy-Goose sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cotton Pygmy-Goose is recorded against all the birds logged in Satpura National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.