What are the chances of seeing a Broad Scarlet in South Luangwa National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Broad Scarlet sighting in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 9 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad Scarlet in South Luangwa National Park?
September
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Broad Scarlet in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June, August and November, the lowest months. That is one of South Luangwa National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 310 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Broad Scarlet?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad Scarlet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is South Luangwa National Park the best place to see a Broad Scarlet?
6th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Broad Scarlet sightings, South Luangwa National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Camargue (France, about 40%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 40%) and Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Broad Scarlet live in South Luangwa National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Broad Scarlet that you can see in South Luangwa National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Southern Banded Groundling (about 40%), Lucia Widow (about 30%) and Red Basker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad Scarlet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad Scarlet is recorded against all the insects logged in South Luangwa National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.