What are the chances of seeing a Siberian Stonechat in Sundarbans National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Siberian Stonechat sighting in Sundarbans National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 172nd most-seen of the 177 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Siberian Stonechat in Sundarbans National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Siberian Stonechat in Sundarbans National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. May and June have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Siberian Stonechat?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Siberian Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sundarbans National Park the best place to see a Siberian Stonechat?
17th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Siberian Stonechat sightings, Sundarbans National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 50%), Manas National Park (India, about 50%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Siberian Stonechat live in Sundarbans National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Siberian Stonechat that you can see in Sundarbans National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 50%) and Taiga Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Siberian Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Siberian Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in Sundarbans National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.