What are the chances of seeing a Large-billed Tern in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Large-billed Tern sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 246th most-seen of the 285 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Large-billed Tern in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Large-billed Tern in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Large-billed Tern?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Large-billed Tern sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Large-billed Tern?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Large-billed Tern sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 70%), Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 30%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Large-billed Tern live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Large-billed Tern that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Royal Tern (about 10%) and Sandwich Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Large-billed Tern sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Large-billed Tern is recorded against all the birds logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.