What are the chances of seeing a Laughing Gull in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Gull sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 220th most-seen of the 285 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Laughing Gull in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Gull in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Laughing Gull?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Laughing Gull sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Laughing Gull?
41st of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Laughing Gull sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 41st at under 5%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 90%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 90%) and Celestún Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Laughing Gull live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Laughing Gull that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Royal Tern (about 10%) and Sandwich Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Laughing Gull sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Laughing Gull is recorded against all the birds logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.