What are the chances of seeing a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Tijuca National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 49 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 132nd most-seen of the 214 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Tijuca National Park?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months. That is one of Tijuca National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 180 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
9th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 30%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 20%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Fringillidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Fringillidae, Finches, Euphonias, and Allies) are Violaceous Euphonia (about 50%) and Chestnut-bellied Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-naped Chlorophonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Tijuca National Park (49 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.