Rhinella alata
Silhouette: Dennis C. Murphy, after http://bit.ly/4q6IESe · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~80% in a week >90%
Advertisement call0:45
Ecuador · 2025
© Marc Anderson · XC1076544 · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Recording0:13
Panama · 2022
© Hubert Szczygieł · iNaturalist · CC BY-NC 4.0
Recording0:12
Panama · 2025
© Edwin Campbell · iNaturalist · CC BY-NC 4.0
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soberanía National Park | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 2 | Utría National Natural Park | 🇨🇴 Colombia | |
| 3 | San Lorenzo Protected Forest | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 4 | Chagres National Park | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 5 | Darién National Park | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 6 | Parque Natural Metropolitano | 🇵🇦 Panama |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panama City | 🇵🇦 Panama |
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Forest Toad sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 9 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and June
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Forest Toad in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, July, September and December–January, the lowest months. May has too few records to rate.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Forest Toad sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Forest Toad sightings, Utría National Natural Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 60%). All parks ranked.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Forest Toad is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Utría National Natural Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
