What are the chances of seeing a Crested Treeswift in Yala National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Treeswift sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 552 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crested Treeswift in Yala National Park?
November
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Treeswift in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 40% in August to October, the lowest months. That is one of Yala National Park's wettest months, with about 340 mm of rain against 35 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Crested Treeswift?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crested Treeswift sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a Crested Treeswift?
Yes
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Crested Treeswift sightings, Yala National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 40%) and Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Crested Treeswift live in Yala National Park?
Same order: Apodiformes
The closest relatives of the Crested Treeswift that you can see in Yala National Park (order Apodiformes, Swifts and Hummingbirds) are Little Swift (about 30%), Asian Palm-Swift (about 20%) and Indian Swiftlet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crested Treeswift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crested Treeswift is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (552 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.