What are the chances of seeing a Pacific Swallow in Bako National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific Swallow sighting in Bako National Park on a given day, based on 73 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 70 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pacific Swallow in Bako National Park?
January, April, August and October
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific Swallow in Bako National Park on a given day, against about 20% in March, the lowest month. November and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pacific Swallow?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pacific Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bako National Park the best place to see a Pacific Swallow?
7th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Pacific Swallow sightings, Bako National Park ranks 7th at about 40%. The best odds are in Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary (Malaysia, about 60%), Raja Ampat (Indonesia, about 60%) and Komodo National Park (Indonesia, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pacific Swallow live in Bako National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Pacific Swallow that you can see in Bako National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Asian Glossy Starling (about 70%), Common Iora (about 70%) and Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pacific Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pacific Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Bako National Park (73 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.