What are the chances of seeing a Torrent Tyrannulet in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 65 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 362nd most-seen of the 505 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Torrent Tyrannulet in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Torrent Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
8th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Torrent Tyrannulet sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Torrent Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Torrent Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (65 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.