What are the chances of seeing a Grey Bushchat in Chitwan National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Bushchat sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 40 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 231st most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Bushchat in Chitwan National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Bushchat in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months. That is one of Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Bushchat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Bushchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Grey Bushchat?
9th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Grey Bushchat sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Jim Corbett National Park (India, about 40%), Langtang National Park (Nepal, about 30%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Grey Bushchat live in Chitwan National Park?
Same genus: Saxicola
The closest relatives of the Grey Bushchat that you can see in Chitwan National Park (genus Saxicola, Stonechats and Bushchats) are Pied Bushchat (about 40%), Siberian Stonechat (about 40%) and White-tailed Stonechat (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Bushchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Bushchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Chitwan National Park (40 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.