What are the chances of seeing a Siberian Stonechat in Chitwan National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Siberian Stonechat sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 690 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Siberian Stonechat in Chitwan National Park?
February and December
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Siberian Stonechat in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May–June and August, the lowest months. Those are among Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Siberian Stonechat?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Siberian Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Siberian Stonechat?
3rd of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Siberian Stonechat sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 3rd at about 40%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 50%) and Manas National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Siberian Stonechat live in Chitwan National Park?
Same genus: Saxicola
The closest relatives of the Siberian Stonechat that you can see in Chitwan National Park (genus Saxicola, Stonechats and Bushchats) are Pied Bushchat (about 40%) and White-tailed Stonechat (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Siberian Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Siberian Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in Chitwan National Park (690 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.